ABA Educational Impact Analysis ToolABA Educational Impact Analysis Tool
Risk-benefit analysis guide for recommending ABA service intensity and placement
Phoenix Rising Behavior & Academic Consulting

    Student Info
    Medical Necessity
    Behavioral Needs
    School Supports
    Family Capacity
    Considerations
    Recommendation
  

  
  
  
  
  
  
  

      
    
Before You Begin
Please read and acknowledge the following
No data is saved or transmitted. Everything you enter stays in your browser only. Phoenix Rising and this website never receive, store, or have access to any information you type into this tool.
Your work will disappear if you refresh or close this page. There is no auto-save. Use the Print / Save as PDF button on the Recommendation page before leaving.
Use initials or pseudonyms. To protect student privacy, avoid entering full names or other personally identifiable information.
This tool does not replace clinical judgment, and Phoenix Rising is not liable for outcomes. The ABA Educational Impact Analysis Tool is a decision-support resource intended to assist qualified professionals. All recommendations must be based on individualized clinical assessment and professional judgment. Phoenix Rising Behavior & Academic Consulting assumes no liability for the development, implementation, or outcomes of any recommendation made using this tool. Users are solely responsible for ensuring that recommendations meet the individual needs of the student and comply with applicable laws, regulations, and ethical standards.

      I understand that no data is saved by this tool, that my work will be lost if I refresh or close this page, and that Phoenix Rising is not liable for the development, implementation, or outcomes of any recommendation made using this tool.
    
Please check the box above to continue.

    
  
Student Information Step 1 of 7
Date of Birth
Assessment Date
Does the student have an IEP or 504?
      IEP
      504 Plan
      Neither
      Unknown
    
Current Age
—
School Tier
SPED Eligibility
Step 1 — Medical Necessity & Assessment
Has an individualized assessment with data been used to determine medical necessity for ABA?
Preset program minimums are not individualized. Intensity should be driven by assessment data, not provider structure.

      Yes — Data-driven
      No — Not yet assessed
      Partial — Some data available
    
Does the student require medically necessary ABA at a full-time intensity?
Full-time = approximately 80% of school week. Preschool: 12+ hrs/wk. K–post-high: 24+ hrs/wk. Full-time hours do not automatically mean removal from school.

      Yes — Full-time needed
      No — Part-time sufficient
      Unclear — Needs more data
    
Current Hours Recommendation Review and revise after completing all domains
Total Recommended ABA Hrs/Week
Recommended Service Model
      
    

    
  
Setting Breakdown (hrs/week)Clinic
Home
Community
School
Clinic
Home
Community
School
Note: This is your current recommendation. After completing all domains, you will have the opportunity to review and revise based on your full analysis.
Skill Acquisition Profile
How significant are this student's skill deficits relative to same-age peers?
Consider whether the level of deficit requires the kind of intensive 1:1 structured teaching only achievable in a clinical setting, or whether the student can make meaningful progress with school-based supports.

      Severe
      Moderate
      Mild
    
How does this student acquire new skills under structured 1:1 teaching conditions?
Rate of acquisition informs whether clinic-based intensive teaching is necessary or whether naturalistic, embedded instruction in school could produce similar gains.

      Relatively Quickly
      Slowly — Requires Many Trials
      Unknown / No Prior Data
    
Does the student generalize skills learned in structured settings to naturalistic environments?

      Yes — Generalizes Well
      Partially
      No — Highly Setting-Specific
    
Does the student's skill profile suggest clinic-intensity structured teaching, or naturalistic/embedded instruction?
Profiles requiring massed trial teaching (absent manding, no imitation, no attending) need trial density that classrooms cannot provide. Other profiles benefit from naturalistic developmental approaches.

      Clinic-intensity Structured Teaching
      Naturalistic / Embedded
      Both — Mixed Profile
    
How significantly do skill deficits limit this student's meaningful participation in school?
Even without significant behavioral challenges, a student may be physically present in school but unable to access educational benefit in any substantive way due to skill level.

      Significantly — Very Limited Participation
      Moderately — Some Participation Possible
      Minimally — Can Participate With Support
    
Step 2 — Behavioral Needs
Does the student demonstrate high-severity behavior causing significant harm?
Consider topography, not just frequency. High-intensity SIB, aggression resulting in injury, and severe property destruction may warrant urgent intervention regardless of other factors.

      Yes — High Severity
      No
      Mild / Emerging
    
What is the frequency of the target behavior?
Frequency alone does not determine placement. A behavior that occurs many times daily but is low-intensity (e.g. calling out, standing up, minor noncompliance) is disruptive but may be addressable within school with a strong BIP. Consider frequency and topography together.

      Multiple Times Daily
      Several Times Per Week
      Infrequent / Situational
    
Are there serious safety concerns for the student or others in a school-based setting?

      Yes — Injury is Likely
      Possible With Current Supports
      No — Manageable in School
    
Step 3 — School Supports & Capacity
Have you reviewed documentation of IEP/504/BIP implementation?
Includes reviewing quality, consistency, and frequency of progress monitoring data; evidence that accommodations and modifications have been provided; and whether data shows patterns of progress or lack thereof.

      Yes — Reviewed
      Exists But Not Reviewed
      No Documentation Exists
    
Has a function-based FBA been conducted and does a BIP aligned to function exist?

      Yes — Both in Place
      Partial — One But Not Both
      No FBA or BIP
    
Has the school implemented evidence-based behavioral interventions with documented fidelity?
Evidence-based interventions include antecedent interventions, behavior teaching interventions, and consequence interventions consistent with current best practice (e.g. USBE 2024 Evidence-Based Interventions for Student Behavior Support).

      Yes — With Fidelity Data
      Attempted But Inconsistent
      No / Unknown
    
What is the realistic ceiling of what this school can provide for this student?
This distinguishes "hasn't tried yet" from "has tried and structurally cannot do more." Consider staffing ratios, physical environment, training capacity, and institutional constraints.

      School Can Meet Needs
      School is Near Its Capacity
      School Structurally Cannot Meet Needs
      Unknown
    
Is the student approaching (within 1–2 years) a critical academic or developmental milestone?
Interrupting school during transition windows carries elevated risk for long-term academic and social outcomes. Full-time ABA may still be appropriate, but services should intentionally bridge the transition.

      Yes — Approaching a Milestone
      No — Not Near a Milestone
    

        High-Risk Developmental Stages to Consider Before Interrupting Schooling
        ▼ Expand
      

        
          Age WindowStageAcademic StakesInterruption Risk
Ages 5–7Early ElementaryLearning to read, basic math foundationsLong-term literacy gaps; hardest to remediate later
Ages 8–10Middle ElementaryReading to learn, multiplication, fractionsWidening achievement gaps across all subjects
Ages 11–13Early Adolescence / Middle SchoolAbstract thinking, pre-algebra, peer social identitySocial setbacks; academic trajectory shifts
Ages 14–17High SchoolCredit accumulation, graduation requirementsCredit loss; graduation timeline at serious risk
Ages 18–21Transition AgePost-secondary, employment, independent livingLoss of IDEA transition services; adult services gap
Any transition yearKG, Elem→Middle, Middle→High, High→Post-HighMajor adjustment in structure, demands, and peersRe-entry harder socially and academically

        
Have potential academic gaps from full-time ABA been discussed with the family?
Families may not fully anticipate how removing a student from school affects long-term curriculum access, grade-level progression, and eventual reintegration requirements. This is an essential informed consent conversation.

      Yes — Family Understands Trade-offs
      Not Yet Discussed
    
Step 4 — Family Capacity & Context
Is the family supportive of the proposed service model?

      Yes — Aligned
      Mixed / Uncertain
      No — Opposed
    
Have past negative school experiences influenced the family's view of ABA versus school placement?

      Yes — Influences Their View
      No Notable History
    
Does the family have the flexibility and support to navigate scheduling challenges that may impact treatment?
Scheduling challenges — staffing changes, school breaks, provider cancellations, insurance gaps — can lead to treatment interruptions that reverse progress. Consider transportation, work schedules, childcare, and backup supports.

      Yes — Flexible and Supported
      Some Challenges — Manageable
      Significant Barriers
    
Is the family logistically and financially able to sustain this service model?

      Yes — No Major Barriers
      Some Barriers — Manageable
      Significant Barriers
    
Is the family willing to work toward building the student's skills and independence with the least amount of support necessary over time?
The goal of ABA is building independence and community participation with the least amount of ongoing support. This is not a school-specific legal standard — it reflects ABA's ethical commitment to meaningful, generalizable outcomes for every client.

      Yes — Independence-Focused
      Uncertain
      No — Prefers Ongoing High-Intensity ABA
    
Step 5 — Additional Considerations
A Note on "Least Restrictive Environment"
LRE is a specific legal standard under IDEA that applies to school placements. Private ABA providers are not legally required to exhaust school-based options before making a recommendation. However, as ABA professionals, we are ethically committed to building our clients' skills to participate in their communities with the least amount of ongoing support necessary for their independence. The questions below reflect that ethical commitment, not a legal obligation.
Have school-based supports been formally attempted or documented as insufficient for this student?
Private practitioners are not legally required to wait for school options to be exhausted. However, the clinical strength of a full-time ABA recommendation is significantly greater when documentation shows less restrictive options have been tried.

      Yes — Documented as Insufficient
      Partially — Some Untried
      No — Not Yet Tried
    
Have less restrictive ABA service models been considered and documented as insufficient for this student?

      Yes — Considered and Documented
      Considered But Not Documented
      Not Yet Considered
    
Does full-time ABA represent the most clinically appropriate option for building this student's skills and independence at this time?

      Yes — Most Appropriate Option
      Uncertain
      No — A Less Intensive Option is More Appropriate
    
Current Recommendation Entered
Setting Distribution
How This Analysis Works
This tool scores your responses across six domains to assess whether the pattern of your answers supports the recommendation you entered. Each response contributes to one of three profiles: full-time ABA, partial/hybrid model, or less intensive / school-based option.


    Factors with elevated weight toward full-time ABA: high-severity behavior, serious safety concern in school, severe skill deficits requiring clinic-intensity teaching, slow acquisition rate, school structurally unable to meet needs, full-time intensity assessed as medically necessary.


    Factors with elevated weight toward a less intensive or school-based model: school assessed as capable of meeting needs, part-time intensity assessed as sufficient, naturalistic learning profile that can be supported in school, significant family sustainability barriers, less intensive options not yet tried or considered.


    If your entered recommendation does not match the dominant profile, the tool will flag the mismatch and explain which factors are driving the difference. You can then keep your recommendation with a documented rationale, or revise it.
Analysis of Recommendation Appropriateness
Key Factors Supporting This Recommendation
Tensions and Gaps Requiring Attention
Developmental Considerations
Suggested Next Steps
Final Recommendation
Final Total Hrs/Week
Final Service Model
        
      
Provisional Rationale (auto-generated — edit before use)
Review Timeline
Scheduled Review Date
Review Interval
        
      
Consider early review if any of the following occur:
Additional Clinician Notes

  
  
ABA Educational Impact Analysis Tool  ·  Phoenix Rising Behavior & Academic Consulting
RISE STRONGER.

Practical support. Ethical decisions. Sustainable change.

Let's Consult!